Sanctity of Exam Affected: Supreme Court Demands Answers in NEET-UG Controversy.
The court was considering a new petition regarding the NEET-UG 2024 controversy, which involves claims of score discrepancies and alleged preferential treatment of certain students.
On Tuesday, the Supreme Court took action, notifying both the central government and the National Testing Agency (NTA) regarding a petition urging the annulment of the NEET-UG 2024 results. This entrance exam for undergraduate medical courses is highly competitive and faces allegations of leaked content.
The court expressed concern, emphasizing that merely conducting the exam doesn't guarantee its integrity. "It is not that simple," remarked the court to the NTA, highlighting the compromised integrity of the examination and demanding explanations.
Despite this, the court decided to allow counseling for admissions to proceed. Justices Vikram Nath and Ahsanuddin Amanullah clarified, "We are not halting counseling." The case is scheduled for July 8, to be heard alongside another plea submitted before Chief Justice DY Chandrachud.
Court Hears Fresh Petition Regarding NEET-UG 2024 Results Discrepancies
The court was recently engaged in a fresh petition addressing the ongoing controversy surrounding the NEET-UG 2024 results. The petition highlighted alleged discrepancies in scores and raised concerns about preferential treatment towards certain students.
Request for Cancellation of May 5 Exam Scores
One of the primary requests put forth in the petition was the cancellation of scores from the May 5 exam, citing irregularities and inconsistencies.
Call for a New Examination
Additionally, the petition urged for the organization of a fresh exam to rectify the perceived issues and ensure fairness in the evaluation process.
Variances in Grace Marks Allocation
The petitioners, hailing from Telangana and Andhra Pradesh, emphasized discrepancies in the allocation of grace marks. They pointed out the absence of a transparent methodology for granting these marks and raised concerns about statistically improbable results, including instances of students achieving perfect scores of 720 out of 720.
Contestation of Provisional Answer Key
Further adding to their argument, the petitioners highlighted discrepancies in the provisional answer key released by the National Testing Agency (NTA). They noted that over 13,000 students had contested the key, pointing to inconsistencies in the provided answers.
Implications of Cheating in Medical Testing
In a plea underscoring the seriousness of cheating in medical examinations, the petition stressed the importance of maintaining integrity in such assessments. It warned against the repercussions of dishonest practices, emphasizing the potential risks to patient safety and the erosion of professional competence.
Threat to Meritocracy and Equal Opportunities
Moreover, the petitioners raised broader concerns about the erosion of meritocracy and equal opportunities due to cheating in exams. They argued that such practices perpetuate social inequalities by favoring individuals who engage in fraudulent activities, thereby undermining the principles of fairness and social mobility.
In summary, the petition called for thorough investigation and corrective measures to address the alleged irregularities in the NEET-UG 2024 examination process, emphasizing the importance of upholding fairness and integrity in educational assessments.
Court Notice Amid Hearing, Results Unaffected
During a hearing led by the Chief Justice on May 17, concerning a petition similar to the ongoing NEET-UG 2024 controversy, the court took cognizance of the matter and issued a notice. However, notably, the court refrained from halting the declaration of results, indicating a cautious approach to the situation.
In the interim, the National Testing Agency (NTA) has taken proactive steps by establishing a high-powered committee tasked with scrutinizing the grievances of 1,600 students who participated in the NEET 2024 examination. This initiative reflects the NTA's commitment to addressing concerns and ensuring fairness in the assessment process.
0 Comments